Gorskiy, Anton Anatolyevich. «Sil’nye voevody», «pervyi voevoda» and «inye voevody»: The denomination of the Mongol nobility in Russian sources

Published Date:

 

For citation: Gorskiy, Anton Anatolyevich. «Sil’nye voevody», «pervyi voevoda» and «inye voevody»: The denomination of the Mongol nobility in Russian sources, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2024. № 1. Pp. 55-63. DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2024.103

Title of the article

«Sil’nye voevody», «pervyi voevoda» and «inye voevody»: The denomination of the Mongol nobility in Russian sources

Authors Gorskiy, Anton Anatolyevich — Dr. Sc. in History, Professor, Institute of Russian History Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia; St. Petersburg State university, St. Petersburg, Russia; Scopus ID 57191985058, SPIN-code 1817-0758, Author ID 71550; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
In the section  Commentarii / Статьи
Year 2024 Issue 1 Pages 55-63
Type of article RAR Index UDK; BBK UDK 94(47).03(093); BBK 63.3(2)42 Index DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2024.103
Abstract

The study is supported by the Russian Scientific foundation grant No 24-18-00407 «The world’s conquest and the collapse of the global empire: the Mongol invasion in the fate of the Russian lands of the 13th century»

The article examines the issue of designating representatives of the Mongol elite in Rus’ sources in the first decades after Batu’s invasion. In the tale of the Ipatiev Chronicle about the capture of Kiev in 1240, both, members of the khan’s family, Batu’s relatives, and military leaders who did not belong to the Chinggisid dynasty are called «voevoda». At the same time, Batu’s «brothers» are defined as «strong commanders», the best Mongol commander Subedei is defined as Batu’s «first governor», the rest of the military leaders are defined as «other commanders». A comparison of the terminology used in relation to the Mongolian and then Horde nobility in sources of the 13th century, on the one hand, and later times, on the other, made it possible to establish that the hierarchy of Russian terms known from the sources of the 14th–15th centuries: khan, supreme ruler — «Caesar /tsar», members of the khan’s family (Genghisids, Juchids) — «princes», emirs (beks) — «princes», had not yet taken shape in the 13th century. The Chinggisid members, as a rule, were mentioned without a title. During this period, the term ryadtsa could be used for people around the khan. Representatives of the Khan’s administration could be determined by position (baskaks). When the context of the sources’ messages was related to military operations, the term «voevoda» was preferred. Moreover, both members of the khan’s family and commanders who did not belong to the ruling dynasty could be called «voevoda». Thus, in the absence of developed Russian terminology to designate the nobility of the conquerors in the first decades after the subjugation of Rus’ to the power of the Mongol khans, the term «voevoda» was used as a universal definition.

Keywords «voevoda», Mongol nobility, Chinggisids, Russian sources of XIII century, terminology, sources studies
Полный текст статьи Article language  Russian
Bibliography

Drobyshev, Yuliy Ivanovich. Otrazhenie mongol’skikh imperskikh idey v russkikh srednevekovykh istochnikakh [Reflection of the Mongol imperial ideas in Russian Medieval sources], in Zolotoordynskoye obozreniye [The Golden Horde Review]. 2023. Vol. 11. No 3. Pp. 532–550 (in Russian).

Fyedorov-Davydov, German Alekseevich. Obshchestvenniy stroy Zolotoy Ordy [Social order of the Golden Horde]. Moscow: Moskow university Press., 1973. 180 p. (in Russian).

Gorskiy, Anton Anatolyevich. Moskva i Orda [Moscow and the Horde]. Moscow: Lomonosov Publ., 2016. 296 p. (in Russian).

[Halperin, Charles J. The Tatar yoke: The image of the Mongols in Medieval Russia. Bloomington, Ind.: Slavica publishers, 2009. 240 p.

Karpov, Aleksey Yuryevich. Batyi [Batu]. Moscow: Molodaya gvardiya Publ., 2011. 352 p. (in Russian).

Kuchkin, Vladimir Andreevich. Mongolo-tatarskoye igo v osveshchenii drevnerusskich knizhnikov (XIII – pervaya chetvert’ XIV v.) [Mongol-Tatar yoke in coverage of Old Russian scribes], in Russkaya kul’tura v usloviyakh inozemnykh nashestviy i voyn: X – nachalo XX v. [Russian culture in terms of foreign invasions and wars: 10th – beginning of 20th centuries] Moscow: Institut istorii SSSR AN SSSR Press., 1990. Pp. 15–69. (in Russian).

Lurye, Yakov Solomonovich. Genealogicheskaya schema letopisey XI–XVI vekov, vklyuchennykh v “Slovar’ knizhnikov i knizhnosti Drevney Rusi” [Genealogical scheme of chronicles of XI–XVI centuries, including in “Glossary of scribes and booklore of Old Rus”], in Trudy otdela drevnerusskoy literatury. Vol. 40. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1985. Pp. 190–205. (in Russian).

Maiorov, Aleksandr Viacheslavovich. The Mongol invasion of South Rus’ in 1239–1240s: Controversial and unresolved questions, in Journal of Slavic military studies. 2016. Vol. 29. No. 3. Рp. 473–499. DOI 10.1080/13518046.2016.1200395.

Nasonov, Arseniy Nikolaevich. Istoriya russkogo letopisaniya XI – nachala XVIII veka [History of Russian annals of XI – the beginning of XVIII century]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1969. 556 p. (in Russian)

Tolochko, Oleksiy Petrovich (ed.) Galits’ko-volynskiy litopis: Tekstologiya [Galich-Volynian chronicle: A textology]. Kiev: Akademperiodika Publ., 2020. 938 p. (in Ukrainian).

Trepavlov, Vadim Vintserovich. Sopravitel’stvo v Mongol’skoy imperii (XIII v.) [Co-ruling in the Mongol empire (XIII century)], in Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. 1987–1991. Wiesbaden, 1991. Рp. 249–278. (in Russian).

Usmanov, Mirkasym Abdulakhatovich. Zhalovannye akty Dzhuchieva ulusa [Granted acts of Jochi ulus]. Kazan’: Kazanskiy university Press., 1979. 318 p. (in Russian).

Tags: Source studies, diplomatic relations, medieval studies, COMMENTARII / ARTICLES, GORSKIY A. A., 13th century

  • Hits: 20