Hope, Michael. A first draft of history: Nasawī’s Account of the Tatars and Early Persian historiography of the Mongol Empire

Published Date:

 

For citation: Hope, Michael. A first draft of history: Nasawī’s Account of the Tatars and Early Persian historiography of the Mongol Empire, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2024. № 1. Pp. 39-54. DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2024.102

 

Title of the article

A first draft of history: Nasawī’s Account of the Tatars and Early Persian historiography of the Mongol Empire

Authors

Hope, Michael — PhD in Asian Studies, Associate Professor of Asian History, Yonsei University, Underwood International College, Seoul, Korea, Orc ID 0000-0003-3454-5458, Scopus ID 56978986200; e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

In the section  Commentarii / Статьи
Year 2024 Issue 1 Pages 39-54
Type of article RAR Index UDK; BBK UDK 94(512.3)(091); BBK 63.211 Index DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2024.102
Abstract

I am indebted to Dr. F. Veselov for his assistance preparing this article.

The middle of the thirteenth century was a pivotal moment in the historiography of the Mongol Empire. Having seized the throne in 1251, Möngke Khan also took control of its past, commissioning a number of new court histories. It is now widely believed that Möngke initiated the compilation of the history of Chinggis Khan (r. 1206–1227) and his successor Ögödei (r. 1229–1241), known as The Secret History of the Mongols. Drawing on earlier genealogies, proclamations, and correspondence, the Secret History has been treated as the first authoritative account of the creation of the Mongol State. Yet this view may not be accurate as there is strong evidence that the first Persian histories of the Mongol Empire were informed by even earlier narrative histories from the Mongol court. The content of these accounts suggest that they were shaped heavily by the information of Qara Khitai officials who either fled, or were appointed to the early Mongol administration of Iran. These Persian authors provide anecdotal evidence of how the Mongols remembered their past before the new version promoted by Möngke took hold. The present study will analyse one of the earliest Persian histories, the Account of the Accursed Tatars and the Beginning of their Rule by Shihāb al-Dīn Nasawī (d. 1250), to determine the possible provenance of these Mongol histories and their contribution to the historiography of the empire.

Keywords Nasawī, Mongol Empire, Chinggis Khan, Tatars, Historiography, Secret History of the Mongols
Full text version of the article Article language  English
Bibliography

Ābād, ‘Alī, Rāshkī, Jawād, ‘Abbāsī. Jawād. ‘Humāyūn-nāmah: Tārīkh-i Manẓūm-i Zajjājī,’, in Justār-ha Ādabī. 2014. No. 187. Pp. 39–58. (in Arabic).

Allsen, Thomas T. Technologies of Governance in the Mongolian Empire: A Geographic Overview in Imperial Statecraft: Political Forms and Techniques of Governance, in Sneath, David (ed.) Inner Asia, Sixth-Twentieth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Pp. 117–140.

Armstrong, Lyall. The Making of a Sufi: al-Nuwayri’s Account of the Origin of Genghis Khan, in Mamluk Studies Review. 2006. No 10/2. Pp. 153–160.

Atwood, Christopher P. Six Pre-Chinggisid Genealogies in the Mongol Empire, in Archivum Eurasiae Medii Aevi. 2012. No. 19. Pp. 5–58.

Atwood, Christopher P. How the Secret History of the Mongols was Written, in Mongolica. 2016. No. 49. Pp. 22–53.

Atwood, Christopher P. The Indictment of Ong Qa’an: The Earliest Reconstructable Mongolian Source on the Rise of Chinggis Khan, in Festschrift for Professor Futaki Hiroshi, Historical and Philological Studies of China’s Western Regions. 2017. No. 9. Pp. 272–306.

Āydinlū, Sajjād. Humāyūn-nāmah Zajjājī wa Shāh-nāmah, in Matn-Shināsī Ādab-i Fārsī. 2014. No. 4. Pp. 1–38. (in Arabic).

Bayarsaikhan, Dashdondog. The Mongols and the Armenians (1220–1335). Leiden: Brill, 2011. 267 p.

Bira, Shagdaryn. Mongolian Historical Writing from 1200 to 1700. Bellingham: Center for East Asian Studies Western Washington University, 2002. 249 p.

Biran, Michal. The Empire of the Qara Khitai in Eurasian History: Between China and the Islamic World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. 279 p.

Broadbridge, Anne. Women and the Making of the Mongol Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018. 341 p.

Buell, Paul. Sino-Khitan Administration in Mongol Bukhara, in Journal of Asian History. 1979. No. 13/2. Pp. 121–151.

De Nicola, Bruno. The Economic Role of Mongol Women: Continuity and Transformation from Mongolia to Iran, in De Nicola, Bruno, Melville, Charles (eds.) The Mongols’ Middle East: Continuity and Transformation in Ilkhanid Iran. Leiden: Brill, 2016. Pp. 79–105.

Dunnell, Ruth. Chinggis Khan: World Conqueror. Boston: Longman, 2010. 119 p.

Favereau, Marie. The Horde: How the Mongols Changed the World. Cambridge, MASS: Belknap Press, 2021. 384 p.

al-Ḥay, ‘Abd. Tārīkh-i Manẓūm Zajjājī, in Yaghmā. 1952. No. 5/12. Pp. 554–559. (in Arabic).

Hope, Michael. Power, Politics, and Tradition in The Mongol Empire and the Īlkhānate of Iran. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016. 238 p.

Hung, William. The Transmission of the Book Known as The Secret History of the Mongols, in Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 1951. No. 14/3. Pp. 433–492.

Lane, George. Genghis Khan and Mongol Rule. Westport: Greenwood Press, 2004. 272 p.

May, Timothy. The Mongol Art of War: Chinggis Khan and the Mongol Military System. Barnsley, UK: Pen & Sword, 2007. 214 p.

May, Timothy. The Mongol Empire. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2018. 442 p.

May, Timothy. The Conquest of Qara Khitai and Western Siberia, in May, Timothy, Hope, Michael (eds.) The Mongol World. London: Routledge, 2022. Pp. 137–149.

Morgan, David. Who Ran the Mongol Empire?, in The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland. 1982. No. 1. Pp. 124–136.

Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. Where did the Mongol Empire Come From? Medieval Mongol Ideas of People, State and Empire, in Inner Asia. 2011. No. 13/2. Pp. 211–237. DOI 10.1163/000000011799297591

Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. Political Order in Pre-Modern Eurasia: Imperial Incorporation and the Hereditary Division System, in Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society. Third series. 2016. No 26/4. Pp. 633–655. DOI 10.1017/S1356186316000237

Munkh-Erdene, Lhamsuren. The Rise of the Chinggisid Dynasty: Pre-Modern Eurasian Political Order and Culture at a Glance, in International Journal of Asian Studies. 2018. No 15/1. Pp. 39–84. DOI 10.1017/S1479591417000195

Ostrowski, Donald. The Tamma and the Dual-Administrative Structure of the Mongol Empire, in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 1998. No. 61/2. Pp. 262–277.

Pelliot, Paul, Louis Hambis. Histoire des Campagnes de Gengis Khan. Leiden: Brill, 1951. 485 p.

Poppe, Nicholas. On Some Proper Names in the Secret History, in Ural-Altaische Jahrbuecher. 1975. No. 47. Pp. 161–167.

Rachewiltz, Igor de. Some Remarks on the Dating of the Secret History of the Mongols, in Papers on Far Eastern History. 1973. No. 7. Pp. 21–36.

Rachewiltz, Igor de. The Dating of the Secret History of the Mongols — A Re-Interpretation, in Ural-Altaische Jahrbuecher. 2008. No. 22. Pp. 150–184.

Togan, İsenbike. Flexibility and Limitation in Steppe Formations: The Kerait Khanate and Chinggis Khan. Leiden: Brill, 1998. 192 p.

Waley, Arthur. Notes on the «Yüan–ch’ao pi–shih», in Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London. 1960. No. 23/3. Pp. 523–529.

Tags: historiography, diplomatic relations, medieval studies, COMMENTARII / ARTICLES, 13th century, HOPE M.

  • Hits: 15