For citation: Sen’, Dmitriy Vladimirovich. Frontier research in present-day Russia: Shaky boundaries of the academic dialogue, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2020. № 1. Pp. 66-80. DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.104
Title of the article | Frontier research in present-day Russia: Shaky boundaries of the academic dialogue | ||||||||
Authors | Sen’, Dmitriy Vladimirovich — Dr. Sc. in History, Professor, Institute of History and International Relations, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia, Leading Researcher, Kalmyk Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Elista, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., OrcID 0000-0002-5222-4685, Scopus ID 57211031437 | ||||||||
In the section | Disputatio / Discussion | ||||||||
Year | 2020 | Issue | 1 | Pages | 66-80 | ||||
Type of article | RAR | Index UDK; BBK | 93; 63.0 | Index DOI | https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.104 | ||||
Abstract |
This article was created with the support of the program for the development of scientific journals under state contract No. 14.597.11.0035 concluded between the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and NEICON/ The article analyses contemporary Russian scholars’ usage of the frontier concept in studies devoted to borders, borderlands, contact zones, and the history of Russian development of new lands. The author highlights controversial areas in such studies, including the features of frontier territories, the typology of Russian frontiers, and the search for counterparts to the term “frontier” in the Russian language and among Russian historical and geographical names. Cases discussed include Russian scholars deny the heuristic potential of the frontier concept for Russian history. Both the rhetoric of such authors and their sometimes far-from-scholarly system of arguments are analyzed. The author considers problems and perspectives of frontier theory in comparison with a similar situation in Ukrainian and American historiography. The modern efforts of scholars from different countries to study lexical analogues of the concept of “frontiers” in order to explain the historical and cultural local specifics of various territories were analyzed. At the same time, some explorers are offering to refuse of this concept in research practices. Attention is drawn to reasons why this theory is especially actively used by representatives of various regional academic centers in Russia. The common and distinctive features of studies in the history of various Russian frontiers are characterized. The most prominent among those frontiers are the Siberian and the southern (North Caucasian) frontiers. The article points out the connection between some development trends of frontier investigations in Russia and the interest growth to regional history, the history of the Russian state expansion and the borders formation of foreign policy. The author draws attention to a new generation of studies which has developed under the influence of the frontier theory. They have significantly transformed the state of academic humanitarian community of the South of Russia, a community that is quiet conservative in relation to modern scientific concepts. Finally, perspective topics were proposed for further use of the frontier concept in research on the history of Russia. |
||||||||
Keywords | historiography, comparative studies, contact zones, borders, frontier, frontier theory | ||||||||
Full text version of the article. | Article language | English | |||||||
Bibliography |
Alekseev, Veniamin Vasilyevich; Alekseeva, Elena Veniaminovna; Zubkov, Konstantin Ivanovich; Poberezhnikov, Igor Vasilyevich. Aziatskaya Rossiya v geopoliticheskoy i tsivilizatsionnoy dinamike. XVI–XX veka [Asian Russia in geopolitical and civilizational dynamics. 16th–20th centuries]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2004. 600 p. (in Russian). Barret, Thomas. M. At the Edge of Empire. The Terek Cossacks and the North Caucasus Frontier, 1700–1860. Boulder, CО: Westview Press, 1999. XV + 243р. Barret, Thomas M. Linii neopredelennosti: Severokavkazskiy «frontir» Rossii [The Line of Uncertainty: Russia’s North Caucasian «Frontier»], in David-Fox, Michael (ed.). Amerikanskaya rusistika: Vekhi istoriografii poslednikh let. Imperatorskiy period: Antologiya [American-Russian Studies: Milestones in Historiography of Recent Years. Imperial period: Anthology]. Samara: Samara University Press, 2000. Pp. 163–193. (in Russian). Basalaeva, Irina Petrovna. Kriterii frontira: K postanovke problemy [Criteria for the Frontier: To the Formulation of the Problem], in Teoriya i praktika obshchestvennogo razvitiya. 2012. No. 2. Pp. 46–49. (in Russian). Bassin, Mark. Turner, Solovyev, and the «Frontier Hypothesis»: The Nationalist Signification of Open Spaces, in The Journal of Modern History. 1993. Vol. 65. No. 3 (Sept.). Рp. 473–511. Berberova, Elena Georgievna. Osobennosti severokavkazskogo frontira Rossiyskoy imperii (1722–1864 gg.): Avtoref. dis. … kand. ist. nauk [Features of the North Caucasian frontier of the Russian Empire (1722–1864): Thesis for a PhD in History degree]. Vladikavkaz, 2014. 22 p. (in Russian). Boeck, Brian James. Frontir ili pograniche? Rol’ zybkikh granits v istorii donskogo kazachestva [Frontier or borderland? The role of shaky boundaries in the history of the Don Cossacks], in Sotsial’naya organizatsiya i obychnoe pravo: Materialy nauchnoy konferentsii [Social organization and customary law]. Krasnodar: Freemen Masters Publ., 2001. Pp. 147–155. (in Russian). Chernous, Viktor Vladimirovich. Kul’turno-tsivilizatsionnoe vzaimodeystvie na Severnom Kavkaze: Istoriya i nekotorye sovremennye tendentsii [Cultural and civilizational interaction in the North Caucasus: History and some current trends], in Istoriya: Nauchnye poiski i problemy. Rostov-on-Don: North Caucasian Scientific Center of Higher Education Publ., 2000. Pp. 164–187. (in Russian). Chornovol, Igor. Vіdpovіdniki ponyattya frontier u іnshikh movakh [Concepts of frontier in other languages], in Koko, Eugeniusz; Nowak, Magdalena; Zaszkilniak, Leonid (eds). Historia-Mentalność-Tożsamość. Rosja i Europa Zachodnia w polskiej i ukraińskiej historiografii XIX i XX wieku [History-mentality-identity. Russia and Western Europe in the Polish and Ukrainian historiography of the 19th and 20th centuries]. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego, 2013. Pp. 125–140. (in Ukrainian). Etkind, Aleksandr Markovich. Vnutrennyaya kolonizatsiya. Imperskiy opyt Rossii [Internal Colonization. Russia’s Imperial Experience]. Transl. by V. Makarov. Moscow: New Literary Review Publ., 2013. 448 p. (in Russian). Gatagova, Lyudmila Sultanovna. Kontaktnye zony v istorii Vostochnoy Evropy [Contact areas in the history of Eastern Europe]. Moscow, 1998. 182 p. (in Russian). Gerasimov, Ilya Vladimirovich; Glebov, Sergey Vladimirovich; Kaplunovskiy, Aleksandr Petrovich; Mogilner, Marina Borisovna; Semenov, Aleksandr Mikhaylovich. V poiskakh novoy imperskoy istorii [In search of a new imperial history], in Novaya imperskaya istoriya postsovetskogo prostranstva [New imperial history of the post-Soviet space]. Kazan’: Tsentr issledovaniy natsionalizma i imperii Publ., 2004. Pp. 7–29. (in Russian). Gerasimov, Ilya Vladimirovich; Glebov, Sergey Vladimirovich; Kusber, Yan; Mogilner, Marina Borisovna; Semenov, Aleksandr Mikhaylovich. Novaya imperskaya istoriya i vyzovy imperii [New Imperial history and the challenges of Empire], in Ab Imperio. 2010. No. 1. Pp. 19–51. (in Russian). Gerasimov, Ilya Vladimirovich (ed.). Novaya imperskaya istoriya Severnoy Evrazii. Chast’ 1: Konkuriruyushchie proekty samoorganizatsii: VII–XVII vv. [A New Imperial History of Northern Eurasia. Part 1: Competing projects of self-organization: 7th–17th centuries]. Kazan’: «Ab Imperio» Publ., 2017. 364 p. (in Russian). Golovanova, Svetlana Aleksandrovna; Shnayder, Vladimir Gennadyevich. Kontseptsiya «frontira» v sovremennoy kavkazovedcheskoy literature [A concept of «frontier» in the Caucasus modern literature], in Vestnik Adygeyskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Regionovedenie: Filosofiya, istoriya, sotsiologiya, yurisprudentsiya, politologiya, kul’turologiya. 2012. Issue 3. Pp. 66–74. (URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-frontira-v-sovremennoy-kavkazovedcheskoy-literature (last visited ― August, 20, 2018)). (in Russian). Granitsy imperii: v poiskakh predelov primenimosti istoricheskikh metanarrativov. Ot redaktsii [The borders of the empire: In search of the limits of applicability of historical metanarratives: From the editors], in Ab imperio. 2003. No. 1. Pp. 9–23. (in Russian). Gribovskiy, Vladislav Vladimirovich. Kazachestvo i ego svyaz’ s tyurkskim mirom v istoriografii pozdney Rossiyskoy imperii, SSSR i postsovetskogo prostranstva [Cossacks and its relationship with the Turkic world in the historiography of the late Russian Empire, the USSR and the post-Soviet space], in Gribovskiy, Vladislav Vladimirovich; Trepavlov, Vadim Vintserovich (eds). Kazachestvo v tyurkskom i slavyanskom mirakh [Cossacks in the Turkic and Slavic worlds]. Kazan’: Institute of Archaeology named after A. Kh. Khalikov (Tatarstan Academy of Sciences) Press, 2018. Pp. 11–69. (in Russian). Hall, Thomas D. Puzzles in the Comparative Study of Frontiers: Problems, Some Solutions, and Methodological Implications, in Journal of World-Systems Research. 2009. Vol. XV. № 1. Pp. 25–47. Hämäläinen, Pekka; Truett, Samuel. On Borderlands, in The Journal of American History. 2011. Vol. 98. No. 2 (September). Рp. 338–361. Kappeler, Andreas. Yuzhniy i vostochniy frontir Rossii v XVІ–XVІІІ vekakh [The Southern and Eastern Frontier of Russia in the 16th–18th Centuries], in Ab Іmperіo. 2003. No. 1. Pp. 47–64. (in Russian). Khlynina, Tatyana Pavlovna; Krinko, Evgeniy Fedorovich; Urushadze, Amiran Tarielovich. Rossiyskiy Severniy Kavkaz: Istoricheskiy opyt upravleniya i formirovaniya granits regiona [Russian North Caucasus: historical experience in managing and shaping the region’s borders]. Rostov-on-Don: The Southern Scientific Centre (RAS) Press, 2012. 272 p. (in Russian). Khodarkovsky, Michael. Russia’s Steppe Frontier: The Making of a Colonial Empire, 1500–1800. Bloomington; Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 2002. 304 р. Khromykh, Aleksandr Stanislavovich. K voprosu o primenenii ponyatiy «kolonizatsiya» i «frontir» v izuchenii istorii Sibiri [To the issue of the application of the concepts of «colonization» and «frontier» in the studying of the history of Siberia], in Istoricheskie issledovaniya v Sibiri: Problemy i perspektivy. 2009. Pp. 108–113. (in Russian). Kopytoff, Igor. The African Frontier: the Reproduction of Traditional African Societies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987. 288 р. Kravchenko, Volodimir. Kharkov / Kharkіv: stolitsa pogranichya [Kharkov/Kharkiv: the capital of the borderlands]. Vilnius: European Humanities University Press, 2010. 357 p. (in Russian). Limerick, Patricia Nelson. The Legacy of Conquest. The unbroken past of the American West. New York: W. W. Norton Publ., 1987. 396 p. Limerick, Patricia Nelson. What on Earth is the New Western History?, in Limerick, Patricia Nelson; Milner II, Clyde A.; Rankin, Charles E. Kansas (eds). Trails: Toward a new western history. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1991. Рp. 81–88. Matveev, Oleg Vladimirovich. Ot fronta k frontiru: Istoriko-antropologicheskie ocherki [From front to frontier: Historical and anthropological essays]. Krasnodar: Edvi Publ., 2015. 272 p. (in Russian). Miller, Aleksey Ilyich. Imperiya Romanovykh i natsionalizm: Esse po metodologii istoricheskogo issledovaniya [Romanov Empire and nationalism: Essay on the methodology of historical research]. Moscow: New Literary Review Publ., 2006. 248 p. (in Russian). Miller, Aleksey Ilyich. Mental’nye karty istorika i svyazannye s etim opasnosti [The mental maps of the historian. And the associated dangers], in Istoricheskiye zapiski. Moscow, 2002. Issue 5 (123). Pp. 323–333. (in Russian). Mizis, Yuriy Aleksandrovich; Skobelkin, Oleg Vladimirovich; Papkov, Andrey Igorevich. Russkiy frontir: Politicheskie, sotsial’nye i ekonomicheskie aspekty. (Yug Rossii v XVI – konets XVIII v.) [Russian frontier: Political, social and economic aspects. (South of Russia in the 16th – the end of the 18th century)], in Vestnik Tambovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2015. Vol. 20. Issue 10. Pp. 7–15. (in Russian). Nash, Gerald D. Creating the West: Historical Interpretations 1890–1990. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1991. 318 р. Oleynikov, Dmitriy Ivanovich. Chelovek na razlome kul’tur: Osobennosti psikhologii russkogo ofitsera-gortsa v period Bolshoy Kavkazskoy voyny [Man at the break of cultures: Features of the psychology of the Russian officer-mountaineer during the Great Caucasian War], in Zvezda. 2001. No. 8. Pp. 95–99 (in Russian). Oleynikov, Dmitriy Ivanovich. Teoriya kontaktnykh zon i dialoga kul’tur primenitel’no k prodvizheniyu Rossii na Severniy Kavkaz v 1810–1860-e gg. [The theory of contact zones and the dialogue of cultures as applied to the advancement of Russia to the North Caucasus in the 1810–1860s], in Actio nova. Moscow: Globus Publ., 2000. Pp. 315–337. (in Russian). Panarina, Darya Sergeevna. Granitsa i frontir kak faktor razvitiya regiona i/ili strany [Border and frontier as a factor in the development of a region and/or country], in Istoriya i sovremennost’. 2015. No. 1 (March). Pp. 15–41. (in Russian). Power, Daniel; Standen, Naomi. (Eds.). Frontiers in Question. Eurasian Borderlands. 700–1700. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999. 293 p. Priymak, Yuriy Vladimirovich. Severo-Vostochnoe Prichernomorye vo vnutri- i vneshnepoliticheskikh protsessakh formirovaniya yuzhnykh granits Rossii (konets XVII – pervaya tret XIX v.) [The northeastern Black Sea coast in the domestic and foreign policy processes of the formation of the southern borders of Russia (late 17th – first third of the 19th century]. Armavir: Poliprint Publ., 2011. 359 p. (in Russian). Repina, Lorina. Mezhdu lokal’nym i global’nym: Poiski integrativnykh podkhodov [Between the local and the global: In search for integrative approaches], in Regіonalna іstorіya Ukraini: Zbіrnik naukovikh statey. Kyiv: Institute of History of Ukraine (NASU) Press, 2011. Issue 5. Pp. 9–28. (in Russian). Riber, Alfred. Menyayushchiesya kontseptsii i konstruktsii frontira: Sravnitel’no-istoricheskiy podkhod [Changing concepts and constructions of frontiers: A comparative historical approach], in Novaya imperskaya istoriya postsovetskogo prostranstva: Sbornik statey. Kazan’: Center for the Studies of Nationalism and Empire Publ., 2004. Pp. 199–222. (in Russian). Rose, Deborah Bird; Davis, Richard (eds). Dislocating the Frontier: Essaying the mystique of the Outback. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2005. 206 р. Severnyi Kavkaz v sostave Rossiiskoi imperii [North Caucasus as part of the Russian Empire]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2007. 460 p. (in Russian). Shebzukhova, Tatyana Aleksandrovna; Berberova, Elena Georgievna. Severokavkazskiy frontir Rossiyskoy imperii (1722–1864) [North Caucasian frontier of the Russian Empire (1722–1864)]. Moscow: OOO «TsIUMiNL» Publ., 2015. 224 p. (in Russian). Slotkin, Richard. Gunfighter nation: The myth of the frontier in twentieth-century America. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998. 864 p. Slotkin, Richard. Regeneration through violence: The mythology of the American frontier, 1600–1860. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2000. 670 p. Slotkin, Richard. The fatal environment: The myth of the frontier in the age industrialization, 1800–1890. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 1998. 636 p. Soboleva, Tatyana Nikolayevna; Bobrov, Denis Sergeevich. Sovremennaya rossiyskaya istoriografiya kontseptsii frontira [Modern Russian historiography of the concept of a frontier], in Izvestiya Altayskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2011. No. 4–1. Pp. 189–193. (in Russian). Sunderland, Willard. Taming the wild field: Colonization and Empire on the Russian Steppe. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press, 2004. XVII + 239 p. Urushadze, Amiran Tarielovich. Rossiyskiy Severnyy Kavkaz: Istoricheskiy opyt upravleniya i formirovaniya granits regiona [Russian North Caucasus: Historical experience of governance and formation of region borders]. Rostov-on-Don: South Federal University Press, 2012. Vinogradov, Boris Vitalyevich; Klochkov, Oleg Borisovich. «Severokavkazskiy frontir» ot fonda Sorosa: K voprosu o tselyakh i kharaktere istoricheskoy mistifikatsii [«North Caucasian Frontier» from the Soros Foundation: On the issue of the goals and nature of historical mystification], in Istoricheskoye regionovedeniye Severnogo Kavkaza — vuzu i shkole. [Historical Regional Studies of the North Caucasus — to the university and school]. Moscow; Armavir: Armavir State Pedagogical Institute Press, 2008. Pp. 29–33. (in Russian). White, Richard. Middle Ground: Indians, Empire, and Republics in the Great Lakes Region. 1650–1815. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991. XVI + 544 p. Worster, Donald. Under Western Skies: Nature and History in the American West. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992. 292 p. Zamyatin, Dmitriy Nikolaevich. Russkie v Tsentral’noy Azii vo vtoroy polovine XІX veka: Strategii reprezentatsii i interpretatsii istoriko-geograficheskikh obrazov granits [Russians in Central Asia in the second half of the 19th century: Strategies for the representation and interpretation of historical and geographical images of the borders], in Vostok: Afro-aziatskie obshchestva: Istoriya i sovremennost’. Moscow, 2002. No. 1. Pp. 43–64. (in Russian). Zamyatina, Nadezhda Yuryevna. Zona osvoeniya (frontir) i ee obraz v amerikanskoy i russkoy kul’turakh [The zone of development (frontier) and its image in American and Russian cultures], in Obshchestvennye nauki i sovremennost’. 1998. No. 2. Pp. 75–88. (in Russian). |
Tags: historiography, DISPUTATIO / DISCUSSION, comparative studies, Area studies, contact zones, frontier studies, borders, frontier theory