English

Filyushkin, Alexander Ilyich. How to study the history of Eastern Europe today?

Published Date:

For citation: Filyushkin, Alexander Ilyich. How to study the history of Eastern Europe today?, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2020. № 1. Pp. 3-24. DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.101

Title of the article How to study the history of Eastern Europe today?
Authors Filyushkin, Alexander Ilyich — Dr. Sc. in History, Professor, St. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., OrcID 0000-0003-2456-7514, Researcher ID F-9139-2013, Scopus ID 55336577600, Spin-code 1117-2468
In the section  Disputatio / Discussion
Year 2020 Issue  1 Pages  3-24
Type of article RAR Index UDK; BBK  947.02; 63.3(2)4 Index DOI  https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu19.2020.101
Abstract The author analyzes the historiographic situation that has developed in recent years on post-soviet space. He draws attention to the changing subject and nature of scientific research. In the historiography of the new nation-states, national history dominates, in their historical politics — nationalism. This weakens the scientific component, since national history in its characteristics is presentist and constructivist. She suffers from autarchy, the work of scientists is confined only to the national reader, and the products which is produced by national historiographies, has mainly domestic consumers, it is difficult to enter the world scientific platform with it. An indicator of the situation is the absence of indexing scientific journals of these countries in international highly rated databases (unlike Russia, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Moldova, which are more oriented to international scientific criteria). There is a reduction in the study of world history, and the history of Russia interpreted in the spirit of the corresponding historical policy and practically not studied in the scientific plan. The article offers an overview of relevant research areas and concludes that scientific integration and the development of a new general concept of the history of the Central-Eastern Europe. Comparative studies are promising here; it is useful to include in the field of comparison and the Balkans and the countries of Central Europe. In the pre-imperial period, the studied historical region in general, it would be more correct to define Central-Eastern Europe from the Elbe and the Danube to Don and Volga, from the Baltic to the Black Sea as a complete region. Historically, everything here was too intertwined and interconnected to plunder it over national historic territories.
Keywords Historiography, methodology of history, Eastern Europe, post-soviet space, historical memory
Full text version of the article. Article language  Russian
Bibliography

  • Alimov, Denis Evgenyevich; Kibin, Aleksey Sergeevich. Review: [Urbańczyk Przemysław. Trudne początki Polski. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o. o., 2008. 420 s. ISBN 978-83-229-2916-2], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2010. No. 1. Pp. 213–236. (in Russian).

    Amitai, Reuven; Biran, Michal (eds). Nomads as Agents of Cultural Change: the Mongols and their Eurasian Predecessors. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2015. 345 p.

    Barford, Pol. Slavs Beyond Justinians Frontiers, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 21–32.

    Bouma, Amieke. Turkmenistan: Epics in Place of Historiography, in Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 2011. Bd 59. H. 4. Pp. 559–585.

    Boytsov, Mikhail Anatolyevich. Vpered, k Gerodotu! [Forward to Herodotus!], in Kazus. Individual’noe i unikal’noe v istorii. 1999. No. 2. Pp. 17–41. (in Russian).

    Bourdieu, Pierre. Identichnost’ i reprezentatsiya: elementy kriticheskoy refleksii idei «regiona» [Identity and Representation: Elements of Critical Reflection on the Idea of a’ Region], in Ab imperio. 2002. No. 3. Pp. 45–61. (in Russian).

    Confino, Michael. The New Russian Historiography, and the Old-Some Considerations, in History and Memory. 2009. Vol. 21. No. 2. Pp. 7–33.

    Curta, Florin. Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 526 p.

    Curta, Florin. The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 496 p.

    Dadabaev, Timur. Power, social life, and public memory in Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan, in Inner Asia. 2010. Vol. 12. No. 1. Pp. 25–48.

    Danilevskiy, Igor Nikolaevich. Povest’ vremennykh let: Germenevticheskie osnovy istochnikovedeniya letopisnykh tekstov [Povest’ vremennykh let: Hermeneutic foundations of source study of chronicle texts]. Moscow: Aspekt Press Publ., 2004. 370 p. (in Russian).

    David-Fox, Michael. Multiple Modernities vs. Neo-Traditionalism: On Recent Debates in Russian and Soviet History, in Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 2006. Bd 54. H. 4. Pp. 535–555.

    Dvornichenko, Andrey. The Place of the Kievan Rus in History, in Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2016. No. 4. Pp. 5–17.

    Dvornichenko, Andrey Yuryevich. «Narrativy! Narrativy! Do chego zh vy doveli...»: O knige T. L. Vilkul «Lyudi i knyaz’ v drevnerusskikh letopisyakh serediny XI–XIII vv.» (M.: Kvadriga, 2009. 408 s.) [«Narratives! Narratives! What have you brought...»: About the book by T. L. Vilkul: «Lyudi i knyaz’ v drevnerusskikh letopisyakh serediny XI–XIII vv.» (M.: Kvadriga Publ., 2009. 408 s.)], in Vestnik St.-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Seriya 2: «Istoriya». 2011. No. 4. Pp. 152–157. (in Russian).

    Ekelchik, Sergey. Ukrainskaya istoricheskaya pamyat’ i sovetskiy kanon: kak opredelyalos’ natsional’noe nasledie Ukrainy v stalinskuyu epokhu [Ukrainian historical memory and the Soviet canon: how the national heritage of Ukraine was defined in the Stalin era], in Ab imperio. 2004. No. 2. Pp. 77–124. (in Russian).

    Epkenhans, Tim. Historiographie in Tadschikistan (Zwischen mythos und minenfeld) [Historiography in Tajikistan (Between myth and minefield)], in Osteuropa. 2012. Bd 62. H. 3. Pp. 137–150 (in German).

    Eremeev, Ivan Igorevich; Dzyuba, Olga Fedorovna. Ocherki istoricheskoy geografii lesnoy chasti Puti iz varyag v greki. Arkheologicheskie i paleograficheskie issledovaniya mezhdu Zapadnoy Dvinoy i ozerom Ilmen’ [Essays on the historical geography of the forest part of the Way from the Varangians to the Greeks. Archaeological and paleographic research between the Western Dvina and Lake Ilmen’]. St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriya Publ., 2010. 670 p. (in Russian).

    Eremeev, Ivan Igorevich. Planigrafija i hronologija drevnejshih jetapov zhizni Rjurikova Gorodishha po materialam issledovanij 2013–2016 gg. [The planigraphy and chronology of the most ancient stages of the life of Rurikov hillfort according to research materials 2013–2016], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2019. No 2. Pp. 67–92. (in Russian).

    Filyushkin, Alexandr Ilyich. Problema genezisa Rossiyskoy imperii [The Problem of the geneses of the Russian Empire], in Gerasimov, Ilya; Glebov, Sergey; Kaplunovskiy, Aleksandr; Mogilner, Marina; Semenov, Aleksandr (eds). Novaya imperskaya istoriya postsovetskogo prostranstva: Sbornik statey. Kazan: Tsentr issledovaniy natsionalizma i imperii Publ., 2004. (Biblioteka zhurnala «Ab Imperio»). Pp. 375–408. (in Russian).

    Franklin, Simon. Pre-Mongol Rus’: New Sources, New Perspectives? in The Russian Review. 2001. Vol. 60. No. 4. Pp. 465–473.

    Grala, Hieronim. Rzeczpospolita Szlachecka ― twór kolonialny? [The Noble Polish Commonwealth — a colonial creation?], in Kieniewicz, Jan (ed.). Perspektywy kolonializmu w Polsce, Polska w perspektywie kolonialnej. Warszawa: WAL UW Publ., 2016. (Debaty Artes Liberales. T. X). Pp. 275–299. (in Polish).

    Grala, Hieronim. Was the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth a Colonial State? in The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs. 2017. No. 4. Pp. 125–150.

    Gritsak, Yaroslav. Ukrainskaya istoriografiya: 1991–2001. Desyatiletie peremen [Ukrainian historiography: 1991–2001. A decade of change], in Ab imperio. 2003. No. 2. Pp. 427–454. (in Russian).

    Halperin, Charles. A comparative approach to Kievan Rus, in Russian History. 2015. Vol. 42. No. 2. Pp. 149–157.

    Ivanov, Sergey Arkadyevich. «V teni Yustinianovykh krepostey»? F. Kurta i paradoksy ranneslavyanskoy etnichnosti [«In the shadow of Justinian’s forts?» F. Curta and paradoxes of the early Slavs’ ethnicity], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 5–12. (in Russian).

    Kappeler, Andreas. Ukraine and Russia: Legacies of the imperial past and competing memories, in Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2014. Vol. 5. No. 2. Pp. 107–115.

    Kasyanov, Georgiy. Ukraina i ee sosedi. Istoricheskaya politika 1987–2018 [Ukraine and its neighbors. Historical politics 1987–2018]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2019. 632 p. (in Russian).

    Khachaturyan, Nina Aleksandrovna. Sovremennaya medievistika Rossii v kontekste mirovoy istoricheskoy nauki [Modern medieval studies of Russia in the context of world historical science], in Srednie veka. 2001. No. 62. Pp. 195–212. (in Russian).

    Kirpichnikov, Anatoliy Nikolaevich; Kurbatov, Aleksandr Valentinovich. Novye dannye o proiskhozhdenii ladozhskogo poseleniya i o poyavlenii slavyan v Povolkhov’e [New data on the origin of the Ladoga settlement and the appearance of the Slavs in Volkhov region], in Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya. 2014. No. 5. Pp. 129–136. (in Russian).

    Koposov, Nikolay Evgenyevich. Kak dumayut istoriki [How historians are thinking]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2001. 325 p. (in Russian).

    Korzun, Valentina Pavlovna; Kolevatov, Dmitriy Mikhaylovich. Obraz istoricheskoy nauki v pervoe poslevoennoe desyatiletie: transformatsiya istoriograficheskikh koordinat [The Image of Historical Science in the First Post-War Decade: Transformation of Historiographic Coordinates], in Dialog so vremenem. 2010. No. 33. Pp. 59–85. (in Russian).

    Kovalev, Roman. Reimagining Kievan Rus’ in unimagined Europe, in Russian History. 2015. Vol. 42. No. 2. Pp. 158–187.

    Kradin, Nikolay Nikolaevich. Vostochnaya Evropa i mongol’skaya globalizatsiya [Eastern Europe and Mongolian Globalization], in Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya. 2016. No. 5. Pp. 17–25. (in Russian).

    Krapauskas, Virgil. Marxism and Nationalism in Soviet Lithuanian Historiography, in Journal of Baltic Studies. 1992. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 239–260.

    Krikh, Sergey Borisovich; Metel, Olga Vadimovna. Sovetskaya istoriografiya drevnosti: Struktury, lyudi, idei: Putevoditel’ po sovetskoy nauke o drevney istorii [Soviet Historiography of Antiquity: Structures, People, Ideas: A Guide to Soviet Science of Ancient History]. Moscow: Lenand Publ., 2019. 200 p. (in Russian).

    Krikh, Sergey Borisovich; Metel, Olga Vadimovna. Sovetskaya istoriografiya drevnosti v kontekste mirovoy istoriograficheskoy mysli [Soviet historiography of antiquity in the context of world historiographic thought]. Moscow: Lenand Publ., 2014. 256 p. (in Russian).

    Krom, Mikhail Markovich. Rozhdenie gosudarstva. Moskovskaya Rus’ XV–XVI vekov [The birth of the state. Muscovy in the 15th–16th centuries]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2018. 256 p. (in Russian).

    Kushko, Andrey; Taki, Viktor. «Kto my?» Istoriograficheskiy vybor: Rumynskaya natsiya ili moldavskaya gosudarstvennost’ [«Who are we?» Historiographic choice: Romanian nation or Moldovan statehood], in Ab imperio. 2003. No. 1. Pp. 485–497. (in Russian).

    Kuzio, Taras. Post-Soviet Ukrainian Historiography in Ukraine, in Internationale Schulbuchforschung. 2001. Vol. 23. No. 1. Pp. 27–42.

    Lanzillotti, Ian. Historiography and the politics of land, identity, and belonging in the twentieth-century North Caucasus, in Nationalities Papers. 2016. Vol. 44. No. 4. Pp. 503–521.

    Lukin, Pavel Vladimirovich. Dekonstruktsiya dekonstruktsii (O knigeT. L. Vilkul po istorii drevnerusskogo vecha) [Deconstruction of deconstruction (About T. L. Vilkul’s book on the history of the Old Russian Veche)], in Baranov, Vladimir; Lourié, Basil (eds). Scrinium. T. 4: Patrologia Pacifica. Selected papers presented to the Western Pacific Rim Patristics Society 3rd Annual Conference (Nagoya, Japan, September 29 – October 1, 2006) and other patristic studies. St. Petersburg: Axiōma Publ., 2008. Pp. 403–434. (in Russian).

    Martyniouk, Aleksey Viktorovich. Do Gerbershteyna: Avstriya i Vostochnaya Evropa v sisteme personal’nykh svyazey i kul’turnykh kontaktov (XIII – nachalo XVI veka) [Before Herberstein: Austria and Eastern Europe in the system of personal connections and cultural contacts (13th – the beginning of the 16th century)]. Moscow: Kvadriga Publ., 2019. 576 p. (in Russian).

    Martyniouk, Aleksey Viktorovich. «Velikiy raskol» vostochnoslavyanskoy medievistiki: Sem’ tezisov k diskussii [“The Great Schism” of Eastern Slavic Medieval Studies: Seven Theses for Discussion], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2017. No. 1. Pp. 146–153. (in Russian).

    Mažeika, Rasa. The Grand Duchy rejoins Europe: Post-Soviet developments in the historiography of pagan Lithuania, in Journal of Medieval History. 1995. Vol. 21. No. 3. Pp. 289–303.

    Milich, Petar. [Review to The Making of the Slavs. History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region c. 500–700 by Florin Curta], in Jahrbücher für Geschichte Osteuropas. 2003. Bd 51. H. 1. Pp. 90–98.

    Mishechkin, GennadiyValeryevich. Teoretiko-metodologicheskaya baza postsovetskoy istoricheskoy nauki (90-e gg. XX – nach. XXI vv.) [Theoretical and methodological base of post-Soviet historical science (90s of the 20th – beginning of 21th centuries)], in Belye pyatna rossiyskoy i mirovoy istorii. 2017. No. 3. Pp. 25–39. (in Russian).

    Morozova, Irina. Contemporary Azerbaijani Historiography on the Problem of «Southern Azerbaijan» after World War II, in Iran & the Caucasus. 2005. Vol. 9. No. 1. Pp. 85–120.

    Plokhy, Serhii. Quo Vadis Ukrainian History? in Harvard Ukrainian Studies. 2015–2016. Vol. 34. No. 1. Pp. 11–34.

    Nefedov, Vyacheslav Viktorovich; Ostroga, Viktor Aleksandrovich. Problemy novoy i noveyshey istorii v sovremennoy belorusskoy istoriografii [Problems of Modern and Contemporary History in Contemporary Belarusian Historiography], in Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2017. No. 5. Pp. 166–178. (in Russian).

    Nieukerken van, Arent. Rus̈ kijowska między eurazją a Europą s̈rodkowowschodnią. Rosyjskie narracje tozsamos̈ciowe z zachodniego punktu widzenia [Kievan Rus between Eurasia and Central and Eastern Europe. Russian identity narratives from the western point of view], in Porownania. 2015. No. 16. Pp. 19–30. (in Polish).

    Pikhoya, Rudolf Germanovich. Vostrebovannaya vremenem istoriya. Otechestvennaya istoricheskaya nauka v 20–30-e gody XX veka [History demanded by time. Domestic historical science in the 20–30s of the twentieth century], in Novaya i noveyshaya istoriya. 2004. No. 2. Pp. 28–53. (in Russian).

    Petrukhin, Vladimir Yakovlevich. Novgodskoe Gorodische I Gnezdovo: 40 let polemiki [Gorodische from Novgorod and Gnyozdovo: 40 years of controversy], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2019. No 2. Pp. 93–100. (in Russian).

    Rebas, Hain. Dependence and Opposition. Problems in Soviet Estonian Historiography in the late 1940s and early 1950s, in Journal of Baltic Studies. 2005. Vol. 36. No. 4. Pp. 423–444.

    Romanchuk, Aleksey Andreevich. Varyago-russkiy vopros v sovremennoy diskussii: Vzglyad so storony [Varyago-Russian question in modern discussion: a view from the outside], in Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya. 2013. No. 5. Pp. 283–299. (in Russian).

    Rüß, Hartmut. Should Kievan Rus’ be forgotten? (German gymnasium history textbooks of the late 20th century), in Quaestio Rossica. 2018. No 6. Pp. 581–595.

    Semenov, Aleksandr. Ot redaktsii. Dilemmy napisaniya istorii imperii i natsii: ukrainskaya perspektiva [From the editors. The dilemmas of writing the history of empire and nation: A Ukrainian perspective], in Ab imperio. 2003. No. 2. Pp. 377–386. (in Russian).

    Sergeenkova, Vera Vasilyevna; Yanovskiy, Oleg Antonovich. Rossiyskaya istoriya v issledovatel’skoy i prepodavatel’skoy praktike istorikov BGU (1921–2017) [Russian history in the research and teaching practice of historians of BSU (1921–2017)], in Zhurnal Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Istoriya. 2018. No. 4. Pp. 117–128. (in Russian).

    Shnirelman, Viktor. Prezidenty i arkheologiya, ili chto ishchut politiki v drevnosti: dalekoe proshloe i ego politicheskaya rol’ v SSSR i v postsovetskoe vremya [Presidents and archeology, or what politicians are looking for in antiquity: the distant past and its political role in the USSR and post-Soviet times], in Ab imperio. 2009. No. 1. Pp. 279–325. (in Russian).

    Shuvalov, Petr Valeryevich. Izobretenie problemy (po povodu knigi Florina Kurty) [The invention of the problem (on Florin Curta’s book)], in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 13–20 (in Russian).

    Streşinǎ, Viorica. Des conclusions sur les représentations de la Moldavie postsoviétique [Conclusions on the representations of post-Soviet Moldova], in Revista Transilvania. 2009. Vol. 1. Pp. 63–67. (in French).

    Sveshnikov, Anton. Sovetskaya medievistika v ideologicheskoy bor’be kontsa 1930–1940-kh godov [Soviet medieval studies in the ideological struggle of the late 1930s-1940s], in Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie. 2008. No. 2. Pp. 86–112. (in Russian).

    Tchoroev, Tyntchtykbek. Historiography of post-Soviet Kyrgyzstan, in International Journal of Middle East Studies. 2002. Vol. 34. No. 2. Pp. 351–374.

    Tolochko, Aleksey Petrovich. Ocherki nachal’noy Rusi [Issues of the beginning of Russia]. Kiev; St. Petersburg: Laurus Publ., 2015. 336 p. (in Russian).

    Tolochko, Aleksey Petrovich. Voobrazhennaya narodnost’ [Imaginary nation], in Ruthenica. 2002. No. 1. Pp. 112–117. (in Russian).

    Tolochko, Oleksiy P. The Primary Chronicle’s «Ethnography» Revisited: Slavs and Varangians in the Middle Dnieper and the Origin of Rus’ State, in Franks, Northmen, and Slavs: Identities and State Formation in Early Medieval Europe. Turnhout: Brepols, 2008. P. 169–188.

    Tomsinskiy, Sergey Vladimirovich. Leningradskiy neonormanizm: istoki i itogi [Leningrad neo-Normanism: origins and results], in Stratum plus. Arkheologiya i kul’turnaya antropologiya. 2014. No. 5. Pp. 357–370. (in Russian).

    Tsaturova, Susanna Karlenovna. O pol’ze prezentizma, ili kak izuchat’ istoki natsional’nogo gosudarstva v ozhidanii ego otmiraniya [About the useful of presentism, or how to study the origins of the nation state in anticipation of its withering away], in Dialog so vremenem. 2018. No. 65. Pp. 59–72. (in Russian).

    Urbańczyk, Przemysław. Trudne początki Polski [Difficult beginnings of Poland]. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego Sp. z o. o. Publ., 2008. 420 p. (in Polish).

    Ushakov, Vladimir Aleksandrovich; Baryshnikov, Vladimir Nikolaevich; Adamova, Nina Eduardovna; Kartsov, Aleksey Sergeevich. 180-letie izucheniya istorii Novogo i noveyshego vremeni v Sankt-Peterburgskom universitete [180th anniversary of the study of the history of modern and contemporary times at St. Petersburg University], in Trudy kafedry istorii Novogo i noveyshego vremeni. 2016. No. 16-1. Pp. 18–66. (in Russian).

    Uvarov, Pavel Yuryevich. «My teryaem ego!» Soobshchestvo rossiyskikh medievistov mezhdu 1985 i 2010 gg. [«We’re losing it!» The community of Russian medievalists between 1985 and 2010], in Elektronniy nauchno-obrazovatel’niy zhurnal "Istoriya". 2010. No. 1. (in Russian).

    Uvarov, Pavel Yuryevich. Sovetskaya medievistika segodnya: utrachennoe nasledstvo ili prodolzhennaya traditsiya? [Soviet medieval studies today: A lost legacy or a continued tradition?], in Elektronniy nauchno-obrazovatel’niy zhurnal "Istoriya". 2014. No. 6. (in Russian).

    Uvarov, Pavel Yuryevich. Vot tut vse i konchilos’, Ili fraktaly rossiyskoy istoriografii [That’s where it all ended, Or the fractals of Russian historiography], in Uvarov, Pavel Yuryevich. Mezhdu «ezhami» i «lisami»: Zametki ob istorikakh. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie Publ., 2015. Pp. 151–159. (in Russian).

    Vilkul, Tatyana Leonidovna. Lyudi i knyaz’ v drevnerusskikh letopisyakh serediny XI–XIII vv. [People and the prince ‘in the ancient Russian annals of the middle of the 11th – 13th centuries]. Moscow: Kvadriga Publ., 2009. 408 p. (in Russian).

    Wulf, Meike; Grönholm, Pertti. Generating Meaning Across Generations: The Role of Historians in the Codification of History In Soviet And Post-Soviet Estonia, in Journal of Baltic Studies. 2010. Vol. 41. No. 3. Pp. 351–382.

    Yusova, Nataliya. Genezis kontseptsii davnoruskoy narodnosti v istorichniy nautsi SRSR (1930-ti – pershapolovina 1940-kh rr.) [The genesis of the concept of the old Russian nationality in the historical science of the USSR (1930s – half of the 1940s)]. Vinnitsya: S. L., 2005. 545 p. (in Ukrainian).

    Zhumagulov, Kalkaman. Contemporary Kazakhstan medieval studies of the periodization of the history of early medieval Europe, in Life Science Journal. 2014. No. 11. Pp. 223–226.

    Zolyan, Mikayel; Zakaryan, Tigran. Representations of «Us» and «Them» in History Textbooks of Post-Soviet Armenia, in Internationale Schulbuchforschung. 2008. Vol. 30. No. 4. Pp. 785–795.

     

 

Tags: historiography, historical memory, memory studies, DISPUTATIO / DISCUSSION, Eastern Europe, FILYUSHKIN A. I., methodology of history, methodology, post-soviet space

  • Hits: 698
  English