Repina, Lorina Petrovna. «A sign accessible to our senses», or Historians in Search of Epistemological Arguments

Published Date:

For citation: Repina, Lorina Petrovna. «A sign accessible to our senses», or Historians in Search of Epistemological Arguments, in Studia Slavica et Balcanica Petropolitana. 2019. № 2. Pp. 3-14. DOI https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.201

Title of the article

«A sign accessible to our senses», or Historians in Search of Epistemological Arguments

Authors Repina, Lorina Petrovna — Doctor in History, Chief Research Fellow, Institute of World History, Russian Academy of Sciences; Professor, Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia, OrcID 0000-0002-8008-9388, ResearcherID A-8518-2018, SPIN-code 6630-2840, e-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
In the section  Commentarii / Articles
Year 2019 Issue  2 Pages  3-14
Type of article RAR Index UDK; BBK UDK 930; BBK 63+60.03
 
Index DOI  

10.21638/11701/spbu19.2019.201

Abstract

In the 1990s it was taken for granted to consider the so-called linguistic turn, the battles of «postmodernists» and «realists» around nature, status and the basic concepts of historiography as the Present. Today, this stormy polemic, which has found expression in a variety of discursive forms, would be interesting to consider as the Past from the point of view of the History of historical science, or rather, the history of discussions around its basic problems. And in such a historical perspective there are significant advantages. The strategy for the historical discussion of the subject field was fully implemented in the well-known works of O. G. Oexle. Based on what has already been achieved in this direction, the author of the article draws attention to another possibility of analyzing the same polemic material — through the prism of the interactive process of constructing new versions, which in modern historiography have received the meaningless name of «moderate» or «compromise». The article assesses the work done by leading historians of this direction in rethinking the key problems of historical knowledge, including the question of the conditions and boundaries of historical knowledge in relation to the question of the conditions and limits of scientific knowledge in general. The author considers the most significant in discussions of objectivity and historical truth not a traditional appeal to how historians think, but a more pragmatic approach aimed at what historians do, not only receiving positive results, but also making and overcoming mistakes. The role of methodological rules and norms of professional activity of the historian is emphasized. Having considered a number of detailed constructive proposals, sustained in the spirit of neoclassical or post-non-classical rationality, the author comes to the conclusion that they are promising from the point of view of advancing the theory and method of «historical science of culture».

Keywords

historical epistemology, history of historiography, relativism, professional norms, historical science of culture

Full text version of the article. Article language  Russian
Bibliography
  • Agazzi, Evandro. Epistemologiya i sotsial’noe: petlya obratnoy svyazi [Epistemology and the social: feedback loop], in Voprosy filosofii. 2010. No. 7. Pp. 58–66. (in Russian).

    Blok, Mark. Apologiya istorii, ili Remeslo istorika [apology of history, or handcraft of the historian]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1973. 232 p. (in Russian).

    Buller, Andreas. Tri lektsii o ponyatii «SLED» [Three lectures on the concept of “The Trace”]. St. Petersburg: Aletheia Publ., 2016. 128 p. (in Russian).

    Filyushkin, Aleksandr Ilyich. Smertel’nye sudorogi ili rodovye muki? Spory o kontse istoricheskoy nauki v nachale XXI v. [Deadly cramps or birth torture? Disputes about the end of historical science at the beginning of the twenty-first century], in Rossiya XXI. 2002. No. 4. Pp. 64–99. (in Russian).

    Ginzburg, Carlo. Primety: Ulikovaya paradigma i ee korni [Signs: Evidence paradigm and its roots], in

    Jenkins, Keith. Re-thinking History. Revised edition. London: Routledge Publ., 2003 (1st ed. — London; New York: Routledge Publ., 1991). 128 p.

    Kirby, Alan. The Death of Postmodernism and Beyond, in Philosophy Now. A Magazine of Ideas. 2007. Issue 58 (URL: http://www.philosophynow.org/issue58/58kirby.htm).

    Kuznetsova, Nataliya Ivanovna. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya v poiskakh simvolicheskogo statusa [Historical epistemology in search of symbolic status], in Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. 2017. Vol. 51. No. 1. Pp. 29–32. (in Russian).

    Megill, Allan. Istoricheskaya epistemologiya [Historical epistemology]. Moscow: «Kanon+» Publ., 2007. 480 p. (in Russian).

    Mortimer, Ian. What isn’t History? The Nature and Enjoyment of History in the Twenty-First Century, in History. 2008. Vol. 93. No. 4. Pp. 454–474.

    Munslow, Alun. A History of History. London: Taylor & Francis Publ., 2012. 232 p.

    Munslow, Alun. Authoring the Past. London: Taylor & Francis Publ., 2013. 224 p.

    Munslow, Alun. Narrative and History. London: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2007. 208 p. (2nd ed. — London: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2018. 182 p.).

    Munslow, Alun. The Future of History. London: Macmillan Publ., 2010. 320 p.

    Oexle, Otto Gerhard. Fakty i fiktsii: o tekushchem krizise istoricheskoy nauki [Facts and Fiction: About the Current Crisis of Historical Science], in Dialog so vremenem. 2001. No. 7. Pp. 49–60. (in Russian).

    Oexle, Otto Gerhard. Istoricheskaya nauka v postoyanno menyayushchemsya mire [Historical science in a permanent changing world], in Dialog so vremenem. 2004. No. 11. Pp. 84–110 (in Russian).

    Repina, Lorina Petrovna. Vyzov postmodernizma i perspektivy novoy kul’turnoy i intellektual’noy istorii [The challenge of postmodernism and the prospects for a new cultural and intellectual history], in Odissey. Chelovek v istorii – 1996. Remeslo istorika na iskhode XX veka. Moscow: Coda Publ., 1996. Pp. 25–38. (in Russian).

    Spigel, Gabriel. K teorii srednego plana: Istoriopisanie v vek postmodernizma [Toward a Theory of a medium plan: Historiography in the Age of Postmodernism], in Odissey. Chelovek v istorii – 1995. Moscow, 1995. Pp. 211–220. (in Russian).

    Torstendahl, Rolf. Professionalizm istorika i istoricheskoe znanie [ Professionalism of the historian and historical knowledge]. Translated from English by A. Yu. Seregina. Moscow: Noviy Khronograf Publ., 2014. 346 p. (in Russian).

    Tosh, John. Stremlenie k istine. Kak ovladet’ masterstvom istorika [The aspiration to the verity. How to become the Master of a historian]. Translated from English. Moscow: «Ves’ mir» Publ., 2000. 296 p. (in Russian).

    Wrzosek, Wojciech. Istoriografiya kak igra metafor: Sud’by «novoy istoricheskoy nauki». Epistemologiya istorii v poiskakh smenyayushchikhsya istoriograficheskikh metafor [Historiography as a game of metaphors: Fates of the “new historical science”. Epistemology of history in search of changing historiographic metaphors], in Odissey. Chelovek v istorii – 1991. Moscow: «Nauka» Publ., 1991. Pp. 60–74. (in Russian).

    Wrzosek, Wojciech. Kul’tura i istoricheskaya istina [Сulture and historical verity]. Moscow: Krug Publ., 2012. 336 p. (in Russian). 

 

Tags: Commentarii / Articles, Contemporary historian in search of a methodology, historical epistemology, history of historiography, relativism, professional norms, historical science of culture